2008 Winter Run courtesy Bob Kopac
Login | You will be able to interact with the MHRRC site if you login

Blogs

Add your blog to the MHRRC site.

rss-img

 

Blog Posts

Star McDougaller - Standing up to the osteoporosis hype  Web Master | 7/22/2008 at 6:45 PM

Several MHRRC members have asked me for more information on osteoporosis after my previous blog.

Here is a link to the McDougall site about a 53 year old woman diagnosed with osteopenia and her journey to better bone health. Be sure to read Dr. McDougall's comments on the left side of the page.

 

Atkins Diet and Fish Oil  Deborah Schwartz | 7/21/2008 at 6:58 PM

In the past few weeks, I have been thinking about fish oil and the Atkins diet because:

  • Our former family physician recommends fish oil to all his patients, no matter what their cholesterol levels are. Seems like some physicians have gone to conferences to learn about the advantages of fish oil.
  • The news has shown stories with a comparison of the Atkins diet, Mediterranean diet, and a "low fat" 30% fat diet and shown that there was little long term difference in weight loss.
  • One of my running buddies is convinced that fish oil is terrific because of its Omega-3s.

Naysayer that I am, here is some food for thought:

The Atkins, low carbohydrate, high protein diet (and it's cousin, the South Beach diet) claim that although Americans have been following a low fat diet for years, Americans are fatter and sicker than ever - so low fat diets don't work. In reality, we have lowered our consumption of fat because of the miracles of food technology, but have substituted high-sugar junk food and high-protein animal foods. We are not on low fat diets!

The Atkins Center for Complementary Medicine (in one of their few published studies, not peer reviewed) put 51 obese people on their diet; the 41 people who maintained the diet for six months did lose 20 pounds - through severe calorie restriction - and the media reported a slight decrease in blood cholesterol. What was not reported about the Atkins study was:

  • 68% experienced constipation
  • 63% reported bad breath
  • 10% noted hair loss
  • 51% reported headaches
  • They also stated other adverse effects, such as calcium oxalyate and urate kidney stones, vomiting, amenorrhea, vitamin deficiencies, and a 53% increase in excreted calcium (weakening bones).

Another study in Australia found that on the Atkins diet "Complications such as heart arrhythmias, cardiac contractile function impairment, sudden death, osteoporosis, kidney damage, increased cancer risk, impairment of physical activity, and lipid abnormalities can all be linked to long-term restriction of carbohydrates in the diet."

As a side requirement of the Atkins diet, Dr. Atkins recommends that many of his patients take nutritional supplements, up to 30 pills a day! While buying all these supplements helps Atkins' bottom line, it does little for health. (All this from The China Study, Colin Campbell). And remember, when Atkins died of heart failure after claiming to have been on his diet for 36 years, he was obese. (Beware of unhealthy experts with financial incentives to promote something).

In the recent news stories, the Atkins diet showed the biggest weight loss, but no mention was made of the health consequences. Then, on the news one night, I heard that the thought-leader pushing the fish oil took payment from the Atkins Institute!

Here is the scoop on fish oil (link to McDougall site for entire discussion):

"Fish oils contain large amounts of cholesterol and will raise the blood cholesterol of people. Even when the fish oil is purified of cholesterol, the omega-3 fat itself will cause the LDL-bad cholesterol to rise ... fish oil treatment for 2 years does not promote favorable changes in the diameter atherosclerotic coronary arteries."

"...fish oils suppress the immune system, which can promote cancer and increase susceptibility to viral infections; and can cause severe bleeding. Fish fat also inhibits the action of insulin, thus increasing a person's tendency to suffer from diabetes."

Here is the link to McDougall about the comparison of the three diets.

The best diet: whole food, plant-based, complex carbohydrate, no added oils diet. No adverse side effects, demonstrated weight loss, reduced cholesterol, reduced blood pressure, and a whole host of other benefits.

 

Bill Clinton and open heart surgery  Deborah Schwartz | 6/11/2008 at 7:08 AM

No matter what your political leanings, we have all been wondering at the missteps of Bill Clinton during Hillary's campaign. We are not used to seeing the volatility and mistakes of such an experienced politician.

John McDougall has been suspecting this behavior may be the result of Bill Clinton's open heart surgery and the known loss of cognitive function that occurs in up to 50% of patients after coronary bypass surgery. There was a recent story about this in the Wall Street Journal and you can also read more about it on McDougall's web site.

I think it is unfortunate that patients are not informed of this very real consequence of coronary by-pass surgery - and that there are safe alternatives (diet and exercise) - and patients are not told that if lifestyle habits are maintained after surgery, the same result is inevitable.

Revenue to doctors and hospitals is a big motivator. As McDougall says, over 80% of some hospitals' revenue comes from coronary by-pass surgery. It is also telling to me that heart surgeons at the Cleveland Clinic (most renowned hospital in the nation for this) disageed with Caldwell Esselstyn's research on the benefits of a plant-based diet until they were personally affected by coronary heart disease. Then, they went to Dr. Esselstyn for help with lifestyle changes (this story is told in Esselstyn's book Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease and in Campbell's The China Study).

People tell me all the time that a plant-based diet seems to radical to them. However, for me, the concept of having my ribs broken, by chest opened, a vein taken from my leg and attached to my heart with the very real risk of cognitive disfunction is the real radical solution. Eliminating animal food is simple and cheap with no bad side effects. In the process, I am, in my own small way, decreasing the amount of cruely to animals at factory farms and helping the environments (2007 UN study that methane from factory farm animals has bigger environmental effect than oil).

Plus, I am probably feeling especially feisty today because I walked out of a physician's office after waiting for more than 45 minutes for my annual physical (yes, he was there, yes, other patients went in ahead of me, no, there was no medical emergency). I've just read Our Daily Meds by Melody Peterson and continue to be aghast at the lack of science and propaganda used to push drugs that are financial boons to all involved except for us patients, who suffer the known, negative consequences.

Patients Commonly Receive Misinformation on Osteoporosis Treatments  Deborah Schwartz | 5/1/2008 at 9:25 AM

Many of you have read my previous articles about nutrition (The Protein Myth and The Nutrient Myth) on this site. One of my favorite sources is John McDougall, MD. His most recent newsletter (May 2008)  has a concise article about osteoporosis and the treatments for this terrible condition. Read it if this is a concern to you.

Link to article.

My mother suffers from osteoporosis in her spine and is always in pain - so I am sensitive to this disease and wish there was some magic bullet. All of the research I have ever read confirms what McDougall says in his article:

  • Drugs used to treat osteoporosis have not been shown to prevent fractures (although they  may make bone density readings look better)
  • Side effects from these drugs can be dangerous
  • Fear of this condition results in much money to medical equipment manufacturers, pharmaceuticals, and medical doctors for testing (note: I dutifully get tested every two years, despite my misgivings).
  • Exercise and eating well (no to minimal animal foods) are the best protection against this condition. I will someday write another article about Dairy Myths, but meanwhile, know that animal foods require your body to produce acid to digest them; your body wants to stay at a constant PH level and uses your bones as a source of chemicals to neutralize this excess acid. As a result, studies have shown that women who drink two glasses of milk per day have more fractures than women consuming no dairy. Epidemiologically, there is a high correlation between bone fractures and dairy consumption in different societies.

Someday, in my spare time, I will write the dairy article - meanwhile, dear running friends - please check out McDougall.

Boston (9)  Conni Grace | 4/25/2008 at 3:11 PM

I am a little disappointed with my race.  I did run the first 18 miles at my goal pace.  After  mile 18 I ran out of "steam".  It had been awhile since this happened to me so I was very unprepared for how to deal with it.  The last 2 miles were pretty much a death march.  All I could think about was how nice it would be to stop and take a little break.  I did make it to the finish without stopping ... barely.
Funny to think about,  that two years ago I would have killed for the time that I ran.  Instead, it is killing me that I wasn’t able to run as fast as I had trained for.  Oh well...  you win some - you lose some!  Even though I didn't have a great race I had a GREAT experience.

 
The whole "elite start" experience was awesome.   The elite women’s field consisted of 53 women.   10 min before the start we were escorted out to the start area.  It was quite unnerving.   I was not prepared for all the spectators and the many TV cameras everywhere.  It was very strange being in such a small field receiving so much attention.  It would have been a very different experience if I had started with the 25000 people that the main field consisted of.  When I saw Joan Benoit holding the starting gun, it all of a sudden struck me that I was running THE Boston Marathon.   It was such a charge!
 
Around mile 16-17 the lead men caught up to me.  They had started along with the main field, 25 minutes after the elite women’s start. The first indicator that they were approaching was 8-10 police cars with flashing lights.  Two camera trucks followed, loaded with people and cameras facing back.  When the lead men finally passed me, I was so charged up by the hoopla that I got pulled along and ran a much too fast mile.  What a sight they were:  A group of 10-12 men just floating along, seemingly effortlessly – passing me so fast it seemed like I was standing still.
 
At the finish I was identified as an elite runner (Had a little silver dot with a "V" in it, on my bib number).  Two guys more or less carried me into the VIP tent, sat me down and got me all kinds of refreshments.  Once I recovered a bit, I changed into dry clothes and got a massage.  I was about ready to leave the tent when 6-8 race officials entered the tent and asked the runners to make room for "Lance".  The runners parted like the Red Sea as Lance Armstrong made his way through the tent.  Several times he stopped to give "high fives" and have his picture taken with runners that asked him for it.  Despite being exhausted from just finishing his marathon he was very accommodating.  I was tempted to stretch my arm out and touch "The Lance".  I didn't think I would appreciate being groped like that right after having finished a marathon so I didn’t' do it.  The whole experience was such a thrill.


Page: